Message Archive from 8/23/05-to-10/06/05
re:I voted 4 you(support)
Just because you voted for me doesn't meam I'm going to vote for you, I'll treat you no different than any other RFA, pretty much I look at your contribs, your talk page, and your interactions with other users, I also will probably not vote for you if you have a RFC or RFA active against you and will most likely not even cast a vote if I haven't had much interaction with you. ----- 06:10, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
- It would appear that your change of heart over your support of Jtkiefer is based on whether or not he would support your candidacy for adminship; I consider this highly unethical, and I would suggest you remove your votes from his RfA entirely. Regardless, you currently have two votes on his RfA, one supporting and one neutral; I would suggest that you remove them both, but if you choose to leave one up I'm going to put up an explanatory note linking to your discussion with Jtkiefer over this matter. Fernando Rizo T / C 14:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- You've removed them both; fair enough. Matter's closed as far as I'm concerned. Fernando Rizo T / C 19:38, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Good G-Unit and G-Unot articles
I believe you
The good, the bad, the ugly. That what I think about these Wiki nuts who go deleting information. It's a shock to see that many of the Wikis are going through a mid-life crisis deleting articles. Surely, A person of good nature will expect this insanity. Yeah, we know this? I am surely experiencing the same shock!
The G-Unit trife. I saw most of the VMAs and believe me I didn't expect 50 to confirm that Mase was officially a part of the label. And then, Suge Knight getting shot. Then The Game and 50 Cent didn't win any award. But what would happen if they did? They would have to come onstage together and after all the feuding between them, yeah! I think VMAs were playing it cool by letting Ludacris take the VMA home finally. All he needed was a Grammy. Don't worry Jadakiss, Fat Joe, Styles and The Game either kept their distance from 50. Of course, the joke. The joke (about security) was kind of a low blow and only proving that a feud between Fat Joe and 50 Cent is ongoing. Fat Joe may never present an award on MTV after that. If 50 Cent retaliated you would see it happen on mixtape. On a positive note, G-Unit has been getting more stronger. After signing newcomers such as Olivia, Mobb Deep, M.O.P. and Mase, 50 Cent decided to make them in the image he felt they should be. I guess 50 Cent got a case of rappers adopting failures syndrome. Good for them! But I rather liked it better when it was just Yayo, Buck, Banks, Game and 50. But as 50 stated, G-Unit is not just a group, it's a label. Say what!? Green Day. The American Idiot s took the most home. Missy holding Ciara's hand, on some of that lesbo-action? Wow the world didn't expect Lil' Kim making a decent appearance. Shocking. Kanye West and R. Kelly making good being drama kings. Jamie Foxx already has an Oscar, now he wants an Grammy. VMAs were too much hip-hop, little different from last year's. But a Diddy party is MTV. Sure enough Diddy danced and Omarion and I guess Mase was looking like a fish out of a shell. And that announcer getting Jeezy name wrong. Lil' Jeezy! I give this VMA a 8 out of 10. Because Suge Knight wasn't shaking things up! Next The Latin Awards and The Source Awards. LILVOKA 29 August 2005 13:33 (UTC)
Hollywood
Yo---I took out Hollywood from "Important cities and towns" in California because Hollywood is neither a city nor a town. If you look at any decent map of L.A., one that shows city borders, it'll show that Hollywood is just a neighborhood in the City of Los Angeles, as the Hollywood article already explains. But since I agree that Hollywood should be mentioned prominently on the California page, I have put a picture of the Hollywood sign in the Economy of California section (and corresponding article) with a link to Hollywood in the caption. If you have any issues with this, raise it on the California talk page. --Coolcaesar 18:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
re:pfd's
if the voting is done and they've been voted to keep then you can remove the templates at any time. ----- 02:35, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your support!
Dear Imdaking, thanks for your vote of confidance at my RfA. I'll try hard to make the soggy mop proud! — Asbestos | Talk 19:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
IfD question
King, I responded to your question on my talk page. Fernando Rizo T / C 23:46, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Photo use
Imda, I am having difficulty adding tags at the moment -- the copyright info is complete, and I have tried to add Web site info. Can you provide some help please. paul klenk 02:47, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
To greg and imdaking
We are talking past each other. At the moment, what is missing where? What I have is what you see. paul klenk 03:06, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Now, one page at a time (I have explained some items at greg's page -- please see it:
- Halloween: It seems one item from that page is on your list. What info about that photo, the dino, is missing? Also, other photos besides this have been removed from the page. Why, and what info about them is missing? "Source" is not helpful, as I have tried to add the Web site. paul klenk 03:33, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Please check Halloween page
Let's focus this page for a moment. RE: the previous state, before image removal, is there anything image removed from this page that is missing info? paul klenk 03:41, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the only photo on the Halloween page that is tagged as being listed on images for deletion is Fixingdino. Per the tag, I have listed on its talk page all the information about the image, arguing that it not be deleted. I am now reverting the page again to its previous state, as every photo on it has 1] name of owner, 2] address of Web site, 3] a description and 4] a GFDL license tag, and, when known, 5] the photographer. These photos are copyright of the parade, and its director, Jeanne Fleming, has granted carte blanche GFDL licensing for the photos.
In the interest of efficiency, cooperation, and the spirit of Wikipedia, please refrain from removing the images from the page until addressing a comment to me specifying exactly what necessary or required information is missing. paul klenk 11:10, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
GFDL tag incompatible with "ifd" tag
After several failed attempts to add the required GFDL tag to the dino photo, in such a way that it would actually appear on the image page along with the ifd tag , I performed the following test:
- temporarily removed ifd tag, with explanation that it was a temporary test.
- added GFDL tag. It worked -- the tag displayed on the page.
- re-added the ifd tag, per tag instructions to "keep it on the page".
- THEN, re-uploaded a new dino image, with a new name, with complete copyright and license information, so the article does not appear to violate image policies.
- REVERTED the article to its state before the images were removed
- You should now be able to view GFDL license information, as well as thorough information concerning its owner, source, photo credit, description, and license information, on the image page and its talk page.
So what we've learned is this; When an image is marked "ifd", a tag which MUST be kept and not removed, it is impossible to add the GFDL tag in such a way that it displays on the page. This seems a bit strange.
Without the measures I took above, it would have been impossible to include the article on the page while providing information, as I was instructed to on the "ifd" tag.
If you are confused about this, please leave a message on my talk page.
I have added a talk page to the original dino photo image and the new one, and have marked it "to watch this page." I suggest we carry on any lengthy further discussions on one of those pages, in the interest of keeping your talk page free of chatter, and to make it easier to follow the measures being taken to document the image.
Again, let me suggest that offering help would take care of any actual problems, keep the process efficient, and keep all efforts in the spirit of Wikipedia. paul klenk 11:54, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Message on Paul Klenk's page
The fun I get around here when I decide to check in during a wiki break. What was that crazy rant on his talk page? You realize that you could take an involuntary vacation for that kind of nonsense. - Lucky 6.9 05:37, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Blocked
After looking at your edit history and reviewing complaints regarding your behavior from ot
Scans made in 1994 (or so)
Party on... ... 4. Halloween 1996 5. Jay in New ... 6. ... Date: 06/11/06 ... KimS
Gallery
IMG_8933.JPG Date: 03/12/06 Views: 123 ... with K&S SF LTG Gingerbread House Contest Halloween 2007 Christmas Party 2007 ... Farewell to the Shafers Farewell to the Kims ...
DJ Sures Blog Gallery
... 2008-10-29 Calgary Borg Halloween Costume ... SVT Focus 2002-11-15 Calgary Kims ... 07-01 Calgary Canada Day 2001-06-12 Windsor DJ Leaving Party
Disney's Kim Possible 06. CD: Walt Disney: Amazon.de: Musik
Disney's Kim Possible 06. CD: Walt Disney: Amazon.de: Musik ... Produktbeschreibungen Halloween An Halloween steigt eine Super-Party. Kims Schwarm, Josh Mankey, ist mit von der ...
Das KIDDINX Downloadportal - Kim Possible - Folge 06 - Halloween - Der ...
Inhalt: Halloween An Halloween steigt eine Super-Party. Kims Schwarm, Josh Mankey, ist mit von der Partie. Eigentlich cool, wenn Kim nicht schon mit Ron verabredet wäre.
party pictures, videos and albums
Our family plus one gathered a week early to ... Halloween Party 2005 ... Kait's Pirate Bday Party 7.15.06
Triplag psychedelic trance :: View Forum - Party trips & lags
3: IllumiNaughty Productions: 940: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:06 am ... 1: Kims: 112: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:16 am PsyFroggie: 07/NOV/2008 ... 31/OCT/2008, Budapest HU - Xenomorph Halloween Party
Wedding Photographers - Photography.com Forums - (15)
... href="http://halloween2910-2.150m.com/halloween-pa rty-recipe.html ">halloween party recipe http://halloween2910-2.150m.com/06-halloween-kims- party.html 06 halloween kims party ...
Wedding Photographers - Photography.com Forums - (14)
... dress halloween dress http://halloween2910-1.150m.com/06-halloween-kims- party.html 06 halloween kims party
06 Halloween Kims Party
06 Halloween Kims Party. From: 06 Halloween Kims Party Date: 19 Jan 2008 Time: 04:34:03 -0500 Remote Name: 69.73.144.92. Comments. http://www.halloweenparty.meenaka.info/06 ...
